An enquiry arrives that may or may not be a real case.
OpusDone works as an AI receptionist for your firm’s first contact, answering the practical part of an enquiry and taking the details you always need. It reaches you as three lines in a form at 23:40, with no phone number and no idea whether it is a landlord dispute or a divorce. It gives no legal advice of any kind, and anything sensitive escalates to a solicitor through a rule that cannot be switched off. Logistics it can answer; the law it will not.
Reviewed

opusdone.com/go/demo
A code at the foot of your letterhead, on the card you hand over after a first meeting, or in the client-care letter you already post. Somebody reads it at home, at an hour when nobody is at the desk, and it takes the matter type, the urgency and a way to reach them — while giving no advice of any kind.
That code opens our own OpusDone assistant — the same assistant your firm would get. It answers only from what you approved, and it does not advise.
Somebody outside your areas, somebody chasing a fee you do not charge, somebody who needed a different firm three months ago. Sorting that costs a fee-earner an hour a week in five-minute pieces.
People write to solicitors on the worst evening of their year. A form that answers nothing, or a bot that chirps back, is the wrong reply to a message about a dying parent or a police interview.
A name, one way to reach them, roughly what it concerns and whether a date is running against them. Nobody ever includes all four, so the first email you send is always the same email.
You cannot tell from the first line. Neither can a contact form.
They find your site at the end of a bad day and write two hesitant sentences.
It answers only what you approved: the areas you take, how a first meeting works, what it costs.
The escalation happens without asking, because sensitive is locked on and cannot be switched off.
The email and the Telegram card both withhold the content and say only that a sensitive topic needs you.
Two taps pause the assistant, and thirty minutes of silence would have handed it back on its own.
The point is not to answer the enquiry. The point is to hold it properly until you can.
It takes the name, the matter type, the contact details and the urgency, and puts a structured enquiry in front of you instead of a voicemail. It gives no legal advice of any kind — which is exactly why you can leave it answering the enquiries that arrive at one in the morning.
Five it will answer today, from knowledge you approved: “Do you offer a first consultation, and what does it cost?” · “Which areas of law do you actually take on?” · “Do you work in English as well as Spanish?” · “Where is the office and is it step-free?” · “What should I bring to a first meeting?”.

Contact and context become one lead with a published arithmetic score: name +10, email +40, phone +40, company or website +25, three or more messages +10. You are alerted at 50, because one reachable contact is enough to act on. People who described a real problem and left no way to reach them go on an unreachable list rather than vanishing.
One lead per person across channels. Export to CSV.

It offers at most six times, at most two from any one day, checked against your hours and your closed days and re-checked at the instant of writing. Minimum notice defaults to 120 minutes so nobody appears in reception twenty minutes from now, and event ids are deterministic, so a retry after a timeout cannot create the same meeting twice.
Google Calendar or Cal.com. One diary for the firm, or one for each solicitor.

Somebody with a problem they have not said out loud yet will not fill in four fields and wait two days. They will ask one careful question, and then decide. It answers what you approved about scope, fees and first consultations — and it does not give advice.

You approve each answer before it can ever be used.
A receptionist who improvises is a professional-indemnity problem. This one cannot.
No view on the merits, no reading of a clause, no “you probably have a claim”. Anything substantive goes to a person, and the enquirer is told a person is taking over.
It answers only from knowledge you approved as live. It will not estimate, will not promise a timeline and cannot offer to check something and come back later.
There is no document or image understanding at all. Files it cannot read skip the model entirely; it says so and brings in a person rather than pretending to have looked.
A platform layer of the prompt, which you cannot edit and a client cannot override, scopes it to your firm alone. If someone asks for a person and the model does not escalate, the runtime escalates anyway.
No legal guidance of any kind: it books, it explains process, and anything substantive goes to a solicitor. Lead delivery to your own Google Sheet or any https endpoint is free on every plan, and the transcript summary stays off unless you switch it on.
Request access